"I have a dream" and the world

A reader congratulates Matt on his participation in the recent “I have a dream” art show in Chicago.

Matt responds:

Thank you.

I was honored and humbled to be asked to be part of that program.

As you know, it started in Spain, and through seeing the enthusiasm of people outside the United States for a speech that took place in Washington, D.C., and the passion, the inquisitiveness, the honor that the world has given this speech and event—I don’t think that aspect is recognized in many quarters.

The U.S.A. is looked at by many different cultures.I have found that when you really know people, they will make a statement about what they really believe.  Every aspect of what goes on in the United States is perceived and topical to other countries.  It strikes me as very important that one speech could be singled out and examined by so many different cultures and nationalities.

We’re always hearing the negativities about the problems we have, but the working-through of the problems, as difficult as they are, really singles us out as a great experiment that is for the most part working.

And that is not only in the U.S. but all around the world.  So we must keep in mind that it matters.  We have to keep developing.

As I said in my remarks to the people at the event, the breaking-down of the color barrier for the Presidency is one event of many.  The next one we have, will be the realization that a woman could very well be a President of the United States.

The day of the election in which Barack Obama prevailed, I got phone calls from all over the world from friends of mine, not only congratulating the man, but congratulating the United States on the symbolic leadership of people of good faith accepting the best leader, regardless of color.

So we’ll keep moving, four steps forward, two steps back.  We’ll get there sometime.

Matt

Related posts

Comments

February 7. 2010 07:48

Mr. Lamb, what you say about Dr. King is very astute, as far as I can
tell. I think it all comes down to charmisma. Don’t know about you,
but when I look at Dr. King, I see a very charismatic messenger with a
message of peace. When I look at the late Adolf Hitler, I see a very
charismatic messenger with a message of hatred. People will be swayed
by charisma no matter whether the message is good or evil. So what do
we do, teach people charisma? The leaders are the ones who have that
certain “X” factor. Your recent comment about John Edwards—he was
very popular in his day. Was it because of his ideology, which was
identical to every other Democratic candidate, or was it because of
his pretty hair and his handsome looks? He might have won due to his
charisma and then he’d be philandering in the White House. JFK
probably won over Nixon because of charisma more than ideas. Who is
to say he would have been a better President than Nixon would have
been, had Nixon won in the election after Eisenhower? Jesus was a
charismatic messenger of a message of peace. Stalin was a charismatic
messenger of a message of evil. What is the common denominator?
What do you think of charisma? You obviously have plenty of it
yourself.

Lamb fan

Add comment


 

[b][/b] - [i][/i] - [u][/u]- [quote][/quote]



Live preview

March 9. 2010 21:23